
"He holds dual degrees in English and education from the University of Connecticut, a master’s in education from Connecticut, and a master’s in journalism from New York University."
Impressive.
So, why is such an educated adult man stooping to the level of teenage chatroom "smack" talk? Well, I'm not positive, but I think it's a ruse. He spends several paragraphs listing all of the commonly-heard "negatives" about homeschooling, yet at the end of his post he invites homeschoolers to consider writing for the site because all of a sudden he notices they have no homeschoolers giving their opinions.
This just all appears to be a little too "set up" for me.
First of all, why would a web site that promotes "perpetual revision" of everything about school from lesson plans to classroom management strategies to teaching philosophies - everything, right down to the seating charts - try to discredit a relatively small group of individuals who teach differently from the regular schools as well as each other? I can't think of a logical reason someone with his educational backgroud would write something like this.
Secondly, in my opinion he wrote this nonsense, got a rise out of several homeschoolers by insulting them, and then proceeded to invite them to write for the web site. Very strange.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, Mr. Scaccia seems to be a homeschooler of sorts himself, with the web site stating:
"Jesse Scaccia has taught high school-aged students in Brooklyn, San Diego, and Cape Town, South Africa, where he currenty teaches at a home for young men."
I started reading the comments on the Teacher, Revised web site, but didn't get through them all. I don't exactly enjoy reading comments like Mr. Scaccia wrote, but by the same token I don't enjoy reading some of the comments from homeschoolers.
In the comments sections I have seen at the end of this and other articles, it would seem that homeschoolers as a whole feel the need to justify what they do by citing their high test scores - to prove their competence as educators, or stating their kids are at least five grade levels above their peers - again to prove their own competence, or to show how much better their kids do than those public school kids, or that their kids are involved in seventeen activities - that socialization thing again, or their kids excel in sports and have thousands of trophies - to prove they're well-rounded and not just boring, overachieving bookworms.
"When we do step into independence, it should be with confidence – so much confidence that we not only don’t care if the state approves, we would reject any offer of its approval as an insult. It is the state that should be seeking our approval and not the other way around."



